<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ELAG2008: Rethinking cataloging</title>
	<link>http://wowter.net/2008/04/14/rethinking-cataloging/</link>
	<description>Comments on the library and information science world</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Schouten</title>
		<link>http://wowter.net/2008/04/14/rethinking-cataloging/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schouten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wowter.net/2008/04/14/rethinking-cataloging/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Library catalogs born in the 20th century? Does Callimachus know? The IFLA principles are an update of the 1961 Paris Principles, but they return to the foundations of Panizzi (ca. 1840). And how can someone plead for getting rid of AACR2 in favor of RDA (=AACR3, but not mainly from the Anglo-American world).

Is this a true representation of what was being said?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Library catalogs born in the 20th century? Does Callimachus know? The IFLA principles are an update of the 1961 Paris Principles, but they return to the foundations of Panizzi (ca. 1840). And how can someone plead for getting rid of AACR2 in favor of RDA (=AACR3, but not mainly from the Anglo-American world).</p>
<p>Is this a true representation of what was being said?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
